Navigating Adversity During Emerging Adulthood: Exploring the Interplay of Psychological Flexibility, Psychological Capital & Resilience

Athira Alex; Kailash Sureshkumar; Ram Gopal C N

doi:10.56508/mhgcj.v9i1.329

Authors

Ms. Athira Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7047-8276
Kailash Sureshkumar Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2343
Dr. C N Ram Gopal Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-8347

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56508/mhgcj.v9i1.329

Keywords:

Psychological Capital, Resilience, Mental Health, Psychological Flexibility

Abstract

Introduction: Youngsters, often seen as the promise of the future, constitute the largest demographic in India. Recent research and statistical reports revealed a shocking decline in the mental health status of Indian youth, who currently face an increase in mental health crises. As per the existing data, emerging adults in India and all over the globe are vulnerable to mental health problems compared to any other age group.

Purpose: The present study aimed to explore the relationship and predictive pathways among Psychological Flexibility, Psychological Capital and Resilience, and to examine the mediating role of Psychological Capital in the link between Psychological Flexibility and Resilience among emerging adults.

Methodology: The study employed a cross-sectional correlational design and purposive sampling to recruit 149 emerging adults aged 18-24 years from a college setting. The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Scale, the Compound Psychological Capital Scale-12 (CPC-12), and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC) were used to collect the data. The data were analysed using statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression, and mediation analysis (Hayes process macro).

Results: Findings revealed that global flexibility is positively related to PsyCap and Resilience, (r = 0.52, p <.01) & (r = .48, p<.01), whereas global inflexibility indicated negative correlation with both (r = -0.41, p <.01) & (r = -0.38, p<.01). Specifically, PsyCap was identified as a partial mediator, (B=0.060, 95% CI [0.032, 0.091]) indicating that flexibility enable individuals to develop internal psychological strength which in turn promote resilience.

Conclusion: By integrating the theoretical formulation offered by COR and Broaden–and–Build theory, the findings provide a novel and comprehensive view of how adaptive cognitive-emotional mechanisms promote resilience during the critical developmental period. The existing body of research also validates these findings. Limitations, Implications and directions for future research were discussed.

References

Ahmed, S. (2025, July 27). 53% of Indian youths are “personality malnourished”: Study. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/53-of-indian-youths-are-personality-malnourished-study/articleshow/122940261.cms

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x

Arnett, J. J., & Tanner, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2005-16266-000-FRM.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11381-000

Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2018). How psychological capital mediates between study-related positive emotions and academic performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(2), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9963-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9963-5

Cherry, J., Singh, G., & Buck, M. (2024). Psychological flexibility as a mediator in the relationship between resilience and academic burnout among Doctor of Physical Therapy students: A structural equation modelling study. Health Science Reports, 7(11), e2291. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2291

Conversano, C., Rotondo, A., Lensi, E., Della Vista, O., Arpone, F., & Reda, M. A. (2010). Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901006010025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901006010025

Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Faustino, B., Vasco, A. B., Haaga, D. A. F., Chamberlain, J. M., Farinha-Fernandes, A., & Delgado, J. (2023). Exploring factor and correlational analysis of the Portuguese version of the Unconditional Self-Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 42(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00492-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00492-w

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218

Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431

Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., Stanton, C. E., Carpenter, J. K., Sanford, B. T., Curtiss, J. E., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 117, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Models, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062

Huang, H., & Kou, H. (2025). Learning agility, self-efficacy, and resilience as pathways to mental health in higher education: Insights from a mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1528066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528066

Huang, P., Lin, Z., Wang, B., & Du, Z. (2025). A mixed-methods exploration of the interrelationships among self-compassion, stress management, psychological capital, and life satisfaction in Chinese university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1510987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1510987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1510987

Jeffords, J. R., Bayly, B. L., Bumpus, M. F., & Hill, L. G. (2018). Investigating the relationship between university students’ psychological flexibility and college self-efficacy. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 22(2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117751071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117751071

Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001

Kumyoung, A., & Kumyoung, N. (2025). Factors impacting student learning burnout: Analysis using structural equation modelling. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2527927. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2527927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2527927

Lorenz, T. (2012). The compound psychological capital scale (CPC 12): Development and validation of a short measure of psychological capital (Doctoral dissertation). Freie Universität Berlin.

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324

Malak, S. A., & Qassim, A. A. (2025). Unpacking the interplay between psychological capital and well-being in entrepreneurs: The mediating role of burnout through conservation of resources theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1590554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590554

Pellerin, N., Raufaste, E., Corman, M., Teissedre, F., & Dambrun, M. (2022). Psychological resources and flexibility predict resilient mental health trajectories during the French COVID-19 lockdown. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 10674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14572-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14572-5

Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2016). Disentangling components of flexibility via the Hexaflex model: Development and validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 23(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905

Sar?çal?, M., Güler, D., & Anandavalli, S. (2021). The relationship among mindfulness, sense of uniqueness, and hope: The mediational role of psychological inflexibility. | Association for Contextual Behavioral Science. (n.d.). https://contextualscience.org/publications/saricali_m_guler_d_anandavalli_s_2021

Schéle, I., Olby, M., Wallin, H., & Holmquist, S. (2021). Self-efficacy, psychological flexibility, and basic needs satisfaction make a difference: recently graduated psychologists at increased or decreased risk for future health issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 569605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569605

Sridevi, G., & Srinivasan, P. T. (2012). Psychological Capital: A Review of Evolving Literature. Colombo Business Journal, 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.4038/cbj.v3i1.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/cbj.v3i1.47

Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320

Wang, Q., Hou, H., & Li, Z. (2022). Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 924357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357