Schwarz, et al. (2020) state that this change,
popular among practitioners and patients, shifts
from a daily performance-based approach to a
“lump-sum GTB”, shifting from in- to outpatient
settings. Savings can then be reinvested along
the full spectrum of care. While there are strong
federal policies there still is a struggle to
systematize mental health services across 16
German states. In particular, differences can be
found between actual number of psychiatric beds
(Salize, Rössler, & Becker, 2007).
General Treatment Approaches- Germany
Germany’s treatment approaches span a wide
spectrum of services deeply steeped in expert
tradition and backed by a robust economy and
heavy regulations that ensure there is accessibility
and outreach. Germany designates three theory-
based psychotherapeutic approaches: Behavioral,
Depth, and (Psycho) Analytic (PubMed Health,
2016). Concepts frequently enunciated within the
German mental health care system are social
education, mental health consulting, assessment,
and case management, in addition to those
providing deep, intensive psychoanalytic
approaches. Germany produced and hosted some
of the world’s most influential psychoanalysts,
including Karen Horney, Erich Fromm, Erik
Erikson, and Gustav Kafka. German was also the
language of Sigmund Freud and thus the early
field of psychoanalysis (Ermann, 2010). They also
track utilization through what they call a Point of
Contact system (National Library of Medicine,
2016). This requires health care professionals
throughout the system to intentionally perform
exploratory examination along with
psychoeducation to ensure people understand the
availability of mental health services.
Lithuania
Lithuania (population 2.8 million; GDP per
Capita 42,551 USD [OECD, 2022]) has a triad of
problems related to mental health care, including
troubling behavioral trends (i.e., addiction,
suicide), under-resourced mental health care
delivery system (WHO, 2011c), and profound
culture-based avoidance to mental health care.
Perceptions of soviet era institutionalization
magnifies stigma toward mental illness (Pūras,
2019). In spite of these challenges, there remains
a growing push for increased funding and
investment in WHO oriented best practices
(Skvernelis & Veryga, 2017).
History of Mental Health System- Lithuania
Lithuania struggles with some of the highest
rates of suicide and alcoholism, all while
attempting to revise their health care systems,
since 1991, after 100+ years of occupation (Puras
et al., 2004). Mental health clinics started in 1996
and grew to ~115 clinics by 2016 (Skvernelis &
Veryga, 2017). In 2007 the Lithuanian parliament
voted to adopt the European mental health
principles recommended by the World Health
Organization (WHO) (Muntianas, 2007). They
hoped to ensure human rights of patients and to
integrate modern services to address mental
health needs through a biopsychosocial method.
Systems Investment- Lithuania
Records on financing of the Lithuanian mental
health system can be hard to find, but financing
for the overall health care system increased from
45.7 to 57.5 million Euros (~$56 to $70 million
USD) between 2012-2016 (Skvernelis & Veryga,
2017). The amount of mental health clinics and
professionals have increased, but there are still
deficits, particularly in child and adolescent
psychiatry). There is a lack of diversified and
prioritized financing in Lithuanian mental health
care, which obscures and limits innovative
services that could benefit the system in the long
run (Šumskienė, 2017; Šumskienė & Petružytė,
2017). Ironically, the current financing approach
most resembles the soviet model, denying
innovation and advancement. Becoming a
European Union (EU) member in 2004 did not
bring essential systemic changes (Pūras et al.,
2013). Certain institutions have stable financing
and no competition. Experts further argue that
inadequate financing hurts non-governmental
organizations, which seek alternative approaches,
a wider range of specialized interventions,
innovative service models, and current mental
health care system reform (Pūras et al., 2013).
General Treatment Approaches- Lithuania
Lithuania has both inpatient and outpatient
psychiatric services that utilize a blend of
counseling, psychopharmacology, and social
supports (often referred to as case management
or psychosocial support) (Dembinskas, 2003).
Lithuanians may more commonly be able to
access mental health care that reflects a
psychosocial paradigm (Šumskienė & Petružytė,
2017). These services focus on sustaining
independent living for those struggling with mental
health issues (Šukys, 2012). While this is likely
done with sensitivity and compassion for the
mental health struggle the person is experiencing,
the level of funding indicates that this
psychosocial approach does not necessarily
include deep and effective psychotherapeutic
treatment (Šumskienė & Petružytė, 2017). There
are discussions in the ministry of health to make
psychotherapy a part of the system, but for now
psychotherapy is primarily attainable only through
private practices (LPS, 2021). There is a
government supported emotional mental hotline
and a complex services packet.
Addiction and suicide continue to plague
Lithuania as rates are among the highest in the
world. Funding and prevention programs have
been inadequate thus far (Skruibis & Žemaitienė,